Hotel housekeepers experience unique workplace hazards and characteristics that increase their risks for poor health outcomes. particularly vulnerable due to workplace hazards and characteristics. Yet the impact of hiring procedures on the fitness of this susceptible worker group continues to be unexplored. Debates on contingent function and employees’ wellness have centered on employees generally (Cummings & Kreiss 2008 Guerrina Melts away & Conlon 2011 Quinlan Mayhew & Bohle 2001 Virtanen et al. 2005 and much less attention continues to be paid to susceptible groups including resort housekeepers. This informative article provides a short summary of the dialogue around contingent function generally and resort housekeepers particularly to assess how this marginalized and underserved employee group may knowledge elevated risk for illness outcomes linked to agency-hiring procedures. CONTINGENT Function Debates regarding the efficiency of contingent function have become even more frequent lately (Benach Amable Muntaner & Benavides 2002 Benach & Muntaner 2007 Cummings & Kreiss 2008 Guerrina et al. 2011 Numbering around 43 million or one-third from the work force DBU in 2005 contingent employees are a main area of the U.S. labor force (Robertson 2006 With an increase of globalization and adjustments in the lifestyle from the labor marketplace U.S. companies now favor short-term contracts often to complement their fluctuating demand for employees (The Boston Talking to Group 2012 Therefore businesses partner with work agencies to keep consistent cost-effective and available labor private pools. The influence of contingent focus on the work force is certainly evidenced with the reported 401 0 brand-new careers provided though personal employment services this year 2010 (The Boston Talking to Group 2012 as well as the $400 billion spent with the U.S. authorities on temporary companies in 2006 (Shane & Nixon 2007 Strengths of contingent function consist of (1) positive changeover from education to operate; (2) quick recovery from unemployment to employment status and part-time to full-time work; (3) effective transition between careers and industry; (4) addressing unemployment rates; (5) skill development; and (6) a balanced life with flexibility and autonomy over personal time (The Boston Consulting Group 2012 However researchers have become more skeptical of the volatile nature of such hiring practices and have noted the negative impact these practices may have on workers including their interpersonal financial and health statuses (Guerrina et al. 2011 Quinlan et al. 2001 Virtanen et al. 2005 However these reports have failed to provide by-industry details including the DBU DBU hotel industry. Contingent Work and Workers’ Health Contingent workers include agency temporary DBU workers (temps) contract organization workers day laborers direct-hire temps impartial contractors on-call workers self-employed workers and standard part-time workers (Robertson 2006 The ease in hiring CD163 temporary workers impacts not only the economy but also the health of workers. Studies have reported the harmful wellness influence of DBU contingent focus on workers (Quinlan et al. 2001 Underhill & Quinlan 2011 Virtanen et al. 2005 Nevertheless these research have mostly centered on Western european employees (Underhill & Quinlan 2011 indicating the necessity for even more exploration among U.S. employees and have however to spotlight the health final results of contingent resort housekeepers probably the most prominent employees within the hospitality sector. Quinlan Mayhew and Bohle (2001) analyzed 93 research and found a link between temporary work and a drop in occupational health insurance and basic safety. They reported high damage rates elevated disease dangers heightened hazard publicity and less understanding of occupational health insurance and basic safety regulations. Another review of 27 studies (Virtanen et al. 2005 explored the relationship between temporary employment and workers’ health and reported higher DBU mental morbidity among temporary workers compared to their permanently hired employees. Virtanen et al. (2005) also found higher risk for occupationally related accidental injuries among contingent workers. Thus contingent work poses a danger to workers’ health and effects health end result disparities between contingent and long term employees. Many factors may donate to these ongoing health disparities. First contingent employees will just work at high-risk low-skill careers (Guerrina et al. 2011 Hintikka 2011 Second contingent employees will be cultural minorities and immigrants (e.g. Hispanics).